The essay below is simply a basic introduction to immigration and related issues. For a more detailed discussion of the issues and more arguments, see this essay. We also have a 20 minute topic lecture here.
___
Every year, millions of people make the difficult decision to leave their homes in South America and journey to the United States in search of a better life.
Why People Migrate from South America to the US
Poverty, violence, lack of economic opportunities, and food insecurity are among the primary reasons people choose to leave South American countries like Venezuela, Colombia, and Ecuador. Many are seeking to escape dangerous conditions and find work to support their families. In recent years, political instability, armed conflict, and economic crises in the region have led to a significant increase in the number of migrants.
Migrants often face harrowing conditions, including threats of violence and exploitation by criminal organizations. The journey itself is perilous, with many risking their lives to cross through jungles, deserts, and rivers. Despite the dangers, the hope for a safer and more prosperous future drives them forward.
Border Apprehension and Processing
The United States employs a complex system to apprehend and process migrants at its borders. The Border Patrol is responsible for detecting and preventing illegal entry between ports of entry. When migrants are apprehended, they are processed by Customs and Border Protection and may be detained or released pending immigration proceedings.
In recent years, the system has been strained by a surge in the number of migrants, particularly families and unaccompanied children. This has led to overcrowding in detention facilities and concerns about the treatment of migrants in custody.
When migrants are apprehended, they are processed by Customs and Border Protection and may be detained or released pending immigration proceedings. Biometric data, such as fingerprints and facial scans, are collected during processing, feeding into databases that can be used for future identification and tracking.
In recent years, the system has been strained by a surge in the number of migrants, particularly families and unaccompanied children. This has led to overcrowding in detention facilities and concerns about the treatment of migrants in custody. The expansion of surveillance infrastructure aims to help manage this influx by providing early detection and enabling more efficient deployment of border security resources. However, the increasing use of AI-powered monitoring has also raised significant privacy and civil liberties concerns, particularly for the predominantly Latino communities living in border areas.
International Protections for Migrants
Under international law, migrants are entitled to certain protections and rights. The International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families, adopted by the United Nations in 1990, stipulates that migrant workers should be protected from violence, threats, and intimidation. It also outlines their rights to consular assistance, safe working conditions, and more.
The origins of international protections for refugees and migrants can be traced back to the early 20th century. In the aftermath of World War I, the League of Nations appointed a High Commissioner for Refugees to coordinate assistance for displaced populations. This laid the groundwork for the modern refugee protection system, further developed under the United Nations after World War II.
A key concept in this international protection framework is the right to asylum. Asylum is a form of protection granted to foreign nationals already in a country or arriving at its borders who meet the international definition of a “refugee” – someone unable or unwilling to return to their home country due to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.
The right to seek asylum is enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which states that everyone has the right to seek and enjoy asylum from persecution in other countries . The 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol further protect refugees from being returned to countries where they risk being persecuted (the principle of non-refoulement).
Asylum seekers are individuals who have fled their countries in search of international protection but whose claim for refugee status has not yet been determined. While their asylum claim is being processed, asylum seekers should receive certain protections, even before being officially recognized as refugees. If granted asylum, they are protected from being returned to their home country, are authorized to work, and may eventually apply for permanent residence
Economic and Security Concerns
The economic impact of immigration is a topic of much debate in the United States. Some argue that an influx of low-skilled workers can drive down wages and strain public services like education and healthcare. However, many economists believe that immigration provides a net positive to the economy by increasing innovation, productivity, and specialization.
From a security standpoint, some policymakers worry about the potential for criminals or terrorists to exploit weaknesses at the border. However, studies have shown that immigrants are less likely to commit crimes than native-born citizens.
One major security concern at the southern border is drug trafficking, particularly the smuggling of fentanyl.
Fentanyl is a powerful synthetic opioid that has been a major contributor to the ongoing opioid epidemic in the United States. It is often mixed with other drugs like heroin or cocaine, sometimes without the user’s knowledge, which can lead to overdoses and deaths.Drug cartels in Mexico and other parts of Latin America are major producers and traffickers of fentanyl. They exploit gaps in border security to smuggle the drug into the US, often using migrants as couriers or concealing it in vehicles or shipments of goods. The ease with which fentanyl can be produced and transported has made it a profitable business for these criminal organizations.
Another grave concern is human trafficking across the southern border. Human trafficking involves the use of force, fraud, or coercion to obtain some type of labor or commercial sex act. Traffickers often prey on vulnerable populations, including migrants seeking to cross the border.
Migrants, especially women and children, are at high risk of being trafficked. Traffickers may offer to help them cross the border, only to trap them in forced labor or sexual exploitation. Some migrants may also fall into the hands of traffickers after crossing the border, particularly if they have no legal status and are afraid to seek help.Combating drug and human trafficking is a major priority for border security agencies. Efforts include intelligence gathering, investigations, and partnerships with law enforcement in other countries.
However, the scale and complexity of these issues make them difficult to eradicate.It’s important to note that while these criminal activities are serious concerns, they should not be conflated with immigration in general.
The vast majority of migrants are not involved in trafficking or other crimes, and are simply seeking a better life for themselves and their families.
Humanitarian and Economic Benefits
Allowing migrants to enter the United States can have significant humanitarian benefits. Many are fleeing desperate situations and seeking a chance at a better life. The US has a long history of providing a safe haven for refugees and asylum seekers.
Immigration can also provide economic benefits to the US. Migrants often fill important roles in the labor market, particularly in agriculture and service industries. They also contribute to the tax base and help offset the effects of an aging population.
Political Controversy
Immigration policy has long been a contentious issue in American politics. Some advocate for stricter border security and enforcement, while others prioritize more humane treatment of migrants and expanded legal pathways to immigration.
Under the Trump administration, hardline policies like family separation and border wall construction sparked intense controversy. President Biden has pledged to take a more welcoming approach, but has faced criticism from both sides as he grapples with a record number of border crossings.
Civil Liberties Concerns Related to Surveillance
Surveillance practices by the government and private sector raise significant civil liberties concerns, particularly around issues of racism and privacy. These concerns are especially acute for communities of color, who have historically been disproportionately targeted by surveillance and face unique risks to their rights and freedoms.
Racism and Surveillance
One of the key ways that surveillance intersects with racism is through the targeting and over-policing of communities of color. Law enforcement agencies have a long history of using surveillance tools to monitor and disrupt the activities of civil rights activists and political dissidents, especially in Black and Brown communities.
In the 1960s, for example, the FBI’s COINTELPRO program infamously spied on and harassed groups like the Black Panthers and leaders like Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. More recently, reports have shown that federal agencies monitored Black Lives Matter activists and deployed sophisticated surveillance technology to track protests against police brutality.
This kind of racially-biased surveillance extends into the digital realm as well. Facial recognition and other AI-powered tools have been shown to exhibit higher error rates for people of color, leading to false arrests and other harms. Predictive policing algorithms that claim to forecast crime have also been criticized for reinforcing racial profiling and over-policing in minority neighborhoods.
At a deeper level, the disproportionate targeting of communities of color for surveillance reflects and reinforces systemic racism. It criminalizes entire populations and perpetuates inequities in the criminal justice system. It also has a chilling effect on free speech, political organizing, and other core civil liberties that are essential for communities fighting against racial injustice.
Privacy Concerns
Surveillance also poses fundamental threats to privacy rights for all individuals, but again, these risks fall heaviest on the most marginalized. Unchecked government monitoring of our communications, locations, associations and activities violates core privacy principles. It inhibits freedom of expression, interferes with personal autonomy, and creates opportunities for abuse of power.
In the private sector, pervasive data collection and profiling by tech platforms and other companies enables discrimination in areas like housing, employment, credit and healthcare. Targeted advertising can exclude people of color from seeing certain economic opportunities. Automated decision-making systems that rely on biased data can entrench racial disparities and deny people their rights.
Marginalized groups are most vulnerable to these privacy harms because they have the least power to resist corporate surveillance and the fewest resources to mitigate its effects. They also face overlapping systems of surveillance that can compound each other. For example, the monitoring of social media by police combined with the tracking of web browsing by advertisers creates a 360-degree view that amplifies risks.
Fundamentally, privacy is about the right to be let alone by the government and to determine for ourselves what information we share with companies. It is an essential component of personal liberty and autonomy. For communities that are already subject to disproportionate government control and private sector exploitation, protecting privacy is a matter of basic dignity and even survival.
In conclusion, the civil liberties concerns around racism and privacy in surveillance are two sides of the same coin. They reflect how the misuse of powerful monitoring tools can reinforce social inequities and threaten the rights of the most vulnerable. Achieving true privacy and racial justice will require reining in both government and corporate surveillance, with a particular focus on the outsized burdens faced by communities of color. It’s a complex challenge, but one that’s fundamental to the promise of liberty and justice for all.