Podcast topic discussion
1. Introduction
Standardized testing has been a cornerstone of the American education system for decades. However, its role in promoting equity in K-12 education has been a subject of ongoing debate and scrutiny. This report aims to delve into the controversy surrounding standardized testing and its impact on equity, examining arguments from both sides of the debate and exploring alternative assessment methods.
2. Defining Key Terms
2.1 Standardized Testing
Standardized tests are assessments administered under uniform and controlled conditions, following specific procedures and guidelines to ensure consistency and comparability of results across test takers1. These tests are typically designed to measure a student’s knowledge, skills, or aptitude in a specific subject area or set of competencies1. Standardized tests are often used in education for various purposes, such as college admissions, academic placement, program evaluation, or educational accountability1. Most standardized tests consist of multiple choice and true or false questions2. Examples of standardized tests include the SAT (Scholastic Assessment Test), ACT (American College Testing), and various state-mandated assessments1.
2.2 Detrimental
Detrimental is a formal way of saying “harmful.” 3 Anything detrimental hurts, hinders, or puts a damper on something3. Detrimental things do damage3. In the context of education, it refers to anything that hinders a student’s learning or academic progress.
2.3 Equity in Education
Educational equity means that each child receives what they need to develop to their full academic and social potential4. This process involves “ensuring equally high outcomes” for all students while “removing the predictability of success or failures that correlate with any social or cultural factor,” such as reliable access to transportation5. Equity does not mean giving everyone the same thing6. Equity means giving each student whatever resources and support they need to optimize their learning and achievement6.
2.4 K-12 Education
K–12 education in the United States includes primary education starting in kindergarten, and secondary education ending in grade 127. Government-funded free schools are generally provided for these grades, but private schools and homeschooling are also possible7.
3. Background on Standardized Testing
Standardized testing in the United States has its roots in the early 20th century8. Initially used to assess student aptitude and track academic progress, it gained prominence with the rise of accountability movements in education. However, concerns about the fairness and effectiveness of standardized tests have persisted, particularly in relation to their impact on marginalized student groups. Some adults involved in students’ education have begun raising doubts over the necessity and benefit of these standardized tests9. They argue that the tests are unfair assessments of their children and do not adequately reflect their strengths and weaknesses9.
4. Arguments in Favor of Standardized Testing
Proponents of standardized tests argue that they offer an objective, common yardstick that helps identify capable students who come from various backgrounds and grading systems10. Thus they prevent discrimination against able minority candidates10. Standardized tests are designed to gather data and analyze it quantitatively11. This helps schools benchmark their students’ educational outcomes against a broad sample used during the standardization process11. A student’s test scores can guide teachers in addressing a specific knowledge or achievement gap11. School administrators can use these test results to identify if any teachers need extra training11. If certain classes aren’t meeting state standards, it might signal the need for professional development to promote teacher effectiveness11. Standardized exams can show how students improve over time by comparing their scores from year to year11. They also allow for straightforward comparisons between students, highlighting changes in their progress11.
5. Arguments Against Standardized Testing
Critics of standardized testing argue that it narrows the curriculum, promotes “teaching to the test,” and disproportionately harms marginalized students12. They contend that standardized tests do not accurately reflect the full range of student abilities and can lead to increased anxiety and stress13. Moreover, they argue that standardized tests are culturally biased and reflect the experiences of the dominant group, putting students from marginalized backgrounds at a disadvantage14. Standardized testing perpetuates institutionalized racism and contributes to the achievement gap between whites and minorities10. For instance, the deeply embedded stereotype that African Americans perform poorly on standardized tests hinders many African Americans’ testing ability10. Also, research has shown that minorities statistically have lower standardized test scores than whites because of existing, hidden biases in the development and administration of standardized tests and interpretation of their scores10.
6. Current State of the Debate
The debate over standardized testing continues to evolve. Recent research suggests that while standardized tests may not be inherently biased, the scores often reflect societal biases and inequalities15. Public opinion on standardized testing is divided, with some supporting its use for accountability and others advocating for alternative assessment methods16. For example, in the U.S. context, students who score one standard deviation higher on math tests at the end of high school have been shown to earn 12 percent more annually, or $3,600 for each year of working life in 200117. Similarly, Heckman, Stixrud, and Urzua find that test scores are significantly correlated not only with educational attainment and labor market outcomes (employment, work experience, choice of occupation), but also with risky behavior (teenage pregnancy, smoking, participation in illegal activities)17.
7. Alternative Assessment Methods
Several alternative assessment methods are considered more equitable than standardized tests. These include:
- Portfolio-based assessment: This involves collecting student work over time to demonstrate learning and growth18.
- Performance-based assessment: This requires students to apply their knowledge and skills to real-world tasks or projects19. In a science and sound assessment, Molly Malinowski’s students use what they learned to create instruments from recycled materials19.
- Authentic assessment: This focuses on evaluating student learning in a meaningful and relevant context20. This can include essays, presentations, projects, research papers, peer reviews, self-assessments, seminars and discussions, oral exams, and capstone projects21.
8. Conclusion
The controversy surrounding standardized testing and its impact on equity in K-12 education is complex and multifaceted. While standardized tests can provide some measure of accountability, they also have limitations and potential drawbacks, particularly for marginalized students. Exploring and implementing alternative assessment methods that provide a more holistic and equitable picture of student learning is crucial.
Works cited
- Standardized Testing – Definition & Meaning – ProctorEdu, accessed December 30, 2024, https://proctoredu.com/glossary/standardized-testing
- Standardized Test Definition and Meaning – Top Hat, accessed December 30, 2024, https://tophat.com/glossary/s/standardized-test/
- www.vocabulary.com, accessed December 30, 2024, https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/detrimental#:~:text=Detrimental%20is%20a%20formal%20way,Detrimental%20things%20do%20damage.
- www.nu.edu, accessed December 30, 2024, https://www.nu.edu/blog/equity-in-education/#:~:text=According%20to%20the%20National%20Equity,of%20success%20or%20failures%20that%E2%80%A6
- Equity in Education: Understanding Equity in the Classroom | NU – National University, accessed December 30, 2024, https://www.nu.edu/blog/equity-in-education/
- Equity in Education: Evidence Based Strategies – ParentPowered, accessed December 30, 2024, https://parentpowered.com/equity-in-education/
- K–12 education in the United States – Wikipedia, accessed December 30, 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%E2%80%9312_education_in_the_United_States
- Racial Bias in Standardized Testing and Equity in Education | NGLC, accessed December 30, 2024, https://www.nextgenlearning.org/articles/racial-bias-standardized-testing
- Standardized testing explained, why it’s controversial, and solutions – iN Education Inc., accessed December 30, 2024, https://ineducationonline.org/2024/07/10/standardized-testing-explained-why-its-controversial-and-solutions/
- Rethinking Standardized Testing From An Access, Equity And Achievement Perspective: Has Anything Changed For African American Students?, accessed December 30, 2024, https://digitalcommons.uncfsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1212&context=jri
- The Benefits and Impacts of Implementing Standardized Tests – Education Advanced, accessed December 30, 2024, https://www.educationadvanced.com/blog/standardized-tests-the-benefits-and-impacts-of-implementing-standardized
- The Dangerous Consequences of High-Stakes Testing, FairTest, the National Center for Fair and Open Testing – IDRA, accessed December 30, 2024, https://www.idra.org/resource-center/the-dangerous-consequences-of-high-stakes-testing/
- The Pros and Cons of Standardized Testing – Schools That Lead, accessed December 30, 2024, https://www.schoolsthatlead.org/blog/standardized-testing-pros-vs-cons
- Standardized Testing: Reflecting or Rejecting Diversity? – Honor Society Foundation, accessed December 30, 2024, https://honorsocietyfoundation.org/standardized-testing-reflecting-or-rejecting-diversity/
- Standardized Testing in Context of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion: We need more, not less., accessed December 30, 2024, https://versatilistperspective.blog/2024/01/13/standardized-testing-in-context-of-diversity-equity-and-inclusion-we-need-more-not-less/
- The Future of Standardized Testing – Marist Poll, accessed December 30, 2024, https://maristpoll.marist.edu/the-future-of-standardized-testing/
- How much should we rely on student test achievement as a measure of success?, accessed December 30, 2024, https://fordhaminstitute.org/national/commentary/how-much-should-we-rely-student-test-achievement-measure-success
- Alternatives to Standardized Tests – Rethinking Schools, accessed December 30, 2024, https://rethinkingschools.org/articles/alternatives-to-standardized-tests/
- Standardized Testing is Still Failing Students | NEA – National Education Association, accessed December 30, 2024, https://www.nea.org/nea-today/all-news-articles/standardized-testing-still-failing-students
- Equitable Assessments & Grading Practices | Center for the Advancement of Teaching Excellence | University of Illinois Chicago, accessed December 30, 2024, https://teaching.uic.edu/cate-teaching-guides/assessment-grading-practices/equitable-assessments-grading-practices/
- Alternatives to Standardized Testing for Assessing Students | Lerna Courses, accessed December 30, 2024, https://lerna.courses/alternatives-to-standardized-testing-for-assessing-students/