Congress (NSDA 2024): A Bill to Ensure Sufficient Nurse Staffing



The nursing profession plays a vital role in the healthcare system, providing essential care to patients in various settings. However, the issue of nurse staffing has been a long-standing concern, with many nurses and healthcare organizations advocating for legislation to ensure adequate staffing levels.

The proposed bill, as outlined in the introduction, aims to address this issue by establishing direct care registered nurse-to-patient staffing ratio requirements and providing a nursing program grant of $250 million.

This essay will explore the pros and cons of this proposed legislation, examining the potential benefits and drawbacks of implementing mandatory nurse-to-patient ratios and providing additional funding for nursing programs. The essay will draw upon research and evidence from various sources to support the arguments presented.

Pros of the Bill

Improved Patient Outcomes

One of the primary arguments in favor of mandating nurse-to-patient ratios is the potential for improved patient outcomes. Numerous studies have demonstrated a link between higher nurse staffing levels and better patient outcomes. For example, a systematic review and meta-analysis by Kane et al. (2007) found that increased registered nurse (RN) staffing was associated with lower hospital-related mortality, failure to rescue, and other patient outcomes.

You must log in below and subscribe to a paid account to see this post!